Saturday, November 04, 2006

Time for Rumsfeld to go

From Air Force Times Monday, 06 November 2006

"So long as our government requires the backing of an aroused and informed public opinion ... it is necessary to tell the hard bruising truth."

That statement was written by Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Marguerite Higgins more than a half-century ago during the Korean War.

But until recently, the "hard bruising" truth about the Iraq war has been difficult to come by from leaders in Washington. One rosy reassurance after another has been handed down by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: "mission accomplished," the insurgency is "in its last throes," and "back off," we know what we're doing, are a few choice examples.

Military leaders generally toed the line, although a few retired generals eventually spoke out from the safety of the sidelines, inciting criticism equally from anti-war types, who thought they should have spoken out while still in uniform, and pro-war foes, who thought the generals should have kept their critiques behind closed doors.

Now, however, a new chorus of criticism is beginning to resonate. Active-duty military leaders are starting to voice misgivings about the war's planning, execution and dimming prospects for success.

Army Gen. John Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command, told a Senate Armed Services Committee in September: "I believe that the sectarian violence is probably as bad as I've seen it ... and that if not stopped, it is possible that Iraq could move towards civil war."

Last week, someone leaked to The New York Times a Central Command briefing slide showing an assessment that the civil conflict in Iraq now borders on "critical" and has been sliding toward "chaos" for most of the past year. The strategy in Iraq has been to train an Iraqi army and police force that could gradually take over for U.S. troops in providing for the security of their new government and their nation.

But despite the best efforts of American trainers, the problem of molding a viciously sectarian population into anything resembling a force for national unity has become a losing proposition.


For two years, American sergeants, captains and majors training the Iraqis have told their bosses that Iraqi troops have no sense of national identity, are only in it for the money, don't show up for duty and cannot sustain themselves.

Meanwhile, colonels and generals have asked their bosses for more troops. Service chiefs have asked for more money.

And all along, Rumsfeld has assured us that things are well in hand.

Now, the president says he'll stick with Rumsfeld for the balance of his term in the White House.

This is a mistake.

It is one thing for the majority of Americans to think Rumsfeld has failed. But when the nation's current military leaders start to break publicly with their defense secretary, then it is clear that he is losing control of the institution he ostensibly leads.

These officers have been loyal public promoters of a war policy many privately feared would fail. They have kept their counsel private, adhering to more than two centuries of American tradition of subordination of the military to civilian authority.

And although that tradition, and the officers' deep sense of honor, prevent them from saying this publicly, more and more of them believe it.

Rumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public at large. His strategy has failed, and his ability to lead is compromised. And although the blame for our failures in Iraq rests with the secretary, it will be the troops who bear its brunt.

This is not about the midterm elections. Regardless of which party wins Nov. 7, the time has come, Mr. President, to face the hard bruising truth:

Donald Rumsfeld must go.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

gold shore favour
[url=http://vimeo.com/user4498961]cheap hotel price
[/url]australian housing
cheap quarter accessories
five principal hotels
[url=http://www.earthday.org/users/48490]cheap maui hotels
[/url]decry and bed deals
allowance motel
take in bath
[url=http://www.fairview.org/cty/members/klemot/default.aspx]nick hotel prices
[/url]cheap printing
touring hostelry deals
scrooge-like budget hotels
[url=http://www.youthcabinet.org/profile/Josh]reserve hotel room
[/url]tawdry toys
conservatism division cars
last min b & b deals
[url=http://www.beautyresearch.com/blogs/alexa/archive/2010/08/15/hotels-and-accomodations.aspx]the george hotel shipston
[/url]b&b house
lousy house of ill repute and ration
decide penny-pinching hotels
[url=http://www.mazdacommunity.com/profiles/blogs/special-hotel-offers-or]south beach hotels cheap
[/url]poor home
cheap crib trim
age casing encyclopedia

Anonymous said...

places to freeze economical
[url=http://vimeo.com/user4498961]low hotel prices
[/url]accommadation deals
segment 8 housing index
compactness category bungalow
[url=http://www.earthday.org/users/48490]hotel montmartre
[/url]airlines rated
economy class airlines
cheap descendants extensions
[url=http://www.fairview.org/cty/members/klemot/default.aspx]hotel five
[/url]flight to
asia hotel
disney breakfast booking
[url=http://www.youthcabinet.org/profile/Josh]parkside hotel
[/url]like new zealand pub deals
compactness categorize cabin
shoddy shy away from houses
[url=http://www.beautyresearch.com/blogs/alexa/archive/2010/08/15/hotels-and-accomodations.aspx]via hotel
[/url]jamaica breakfast prices
area class airline
cheap hotels la
[url=http://www.mazdacommunity.com/profiles/blogs/special-hotel-offers-or]cheap hotels rooms
[/url]bed deals within easy reach
cheap holidays
best thrift league airline

Anonymous said...

price of hotel
cheap hotel stay
arcantis hotel frochot
taj hotel
und hotels
james hotel