Sunday, August 12, 2007

A Case So Shielded One Side Is in the Dark

Published: August 13, 2007

San Francisco

Jon B. Eisenberg knows something so secret that the government will let him write it down only in a secure facility.

Mr. Eisenberg is suing the government on behalf of clients who say they were illegally wiretapped by the National Security Agency. Yet he was required to write an appellate brief in a government office, supervised by a Justice Department security officer.

“We were forbidden from bringing pre-prepared notes into the room,” Mr. Eisenberg wrote in an e-mail message in late June, the day after he and his colleague Steven Goldberg spent three hours at the offices of the United States attorney here, preparing the secret brief.

“We were not allowed to keep a copy of what we wrote,” Mr. Eisenberg continued. “Our drafts were retained by the security officer for shredding. We were allowed to print out five copies of the final document: one for each judge, one for the government attorneys, and one to be retained” in a Justice Department safe. “Not even the judges’ staff attorneys will be permitted to see the document.”

The brief was filed in an appeal that will be heard here on Wednesday by a panel of three federal judges. At its center is a document that Mr. Eisenberg’s clients, an Islamic charity and two of its lawyers, say proves that their international communications were the subject of N.S.A. eavesdropping in the spring of 2004.

How the court here, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, decides to deal with the document may determine whether the courts will ever rule on the legality of the wiretapping program.

Last month, the federal appeals court in Cincinnati dismissed a separate challenge to the wiretapping program, saying the plaintiffs there, including journalists and lawyers, could not prove they had actually been subject to surveillance and so could not show the kind of direct and concrete injury needed to establish what lawyers call standing. And a new law may have cut off the ability of other plaintiffs to sue over new surveillance.

But Mr. Eisenberg’s clients, al-Haramain Islamic Foundation and two of its lawyers, say they are in an exceptional position — thanks to government bungling.

In August 2004, the Treasury Department inadvertently gave them a copy of a classified document they say proves they were subject to wiretapping without court approval that spring. The F.B.I. soon retrieved it, but Mr. Eisenberg seems to have what the government refers to as a “mental photocopy.”

The argument this week involves two consolidated cases, one a class action against AT&T for what the plaintiffs say was its role in aiding the N.S.A., the other the Haramain case against the government.

The government’s fundamental argument in both cases is that national security concerns require dismissal, under the so-called state secrets privilege.

“Whether plaintiffs were subjected to surveillance is a state secret, and information tending to confirm or deny that fact is privileged,” government lawyers wrote in the public version of a brief filed last month in the Haramain case.

The government has made additional arguments as well — in classified briefs that Mr. Eisenberg and his colleagues have not been allowed to see.

A decision last month from another federal appeals court, in Washington, complicates the government’s position. That case involved claims of wiretapping in Myanmar in 1993, and the government sought to dismiss the suit on state secrets grounds.

The majority of the divided three-judge panel in Washington rejected what it called “a ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ approach to state secrets.”

The government’s theory, Judge Judith W. Rogers wrote for the majority, was that “whenever the plaintiff lacks information about his claim, the complaint must be dismissed” — as in the Cincinnati appeal. “But as soon as any information is acquired, it becomes too risky to introduce the evidence at trial” — as in the Haramain case.

“Neither the Supreme Court nor this court has adopted such an all-or-nothing approach,” Judge Rogers wrote, allowing part of that suit to proceed to trial.

As for Mr. Eisenberg, he is still scratching his head over what national security litigation has become.

“So, it’s like this,” he said in the e-mail message. “Yesterday, under the auspices and control of my litigation adversaries, at their offices and on their computer, I wrote a brief, of which I was not allowed to keep a copy, responding to arguments which I was not permitted to see, which will be met by a reply which I will not be permitted to see.”

“Yes,” he said, “I’d say that’s the most bizarre brief-writing experience of my career.”

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

dwelling subsidized
[url=http://vimeo.com/user4498961]cheapest hotel prices
[/url]honour my worth hotels
cheap flights to uk
cheap checks
[url=http://www.earthday.org/users/48490]hotel montmartre
[/url]bed packages
great prices on hotels
seedy kitchen
[url=http://www.fairview.org/cty/members/klemot/default.aspx]last minute hotel prices
[/url]accommodations in lake community
found your own house base
tangalooma conformity
[url=http://www.youthcabinet.org/profile/Josh]hotel chandler
[/url]bath cheap
great prices on hotels
five principal hotels
[url=http://www.beautyresearch.com/blogs/alexa/archive/2010/08/15/hotels-and-accomodations.aspx]hotel free port
[/url]hotel okay
share housing
indian airlines
[url=http://www.mazdacommunity.com/profiles/blogs/special-hotel-offers-or]hotel cheap uk
[/url]saudi airlines online booking
lodging booking length of existence
low receipts apartments

Anonymous said...

low-grade visitor houses in barbados
prices on hotel
d4 hotels
cheese-paring weekend breaks
covering association
hotel weddings
tawdry houses usa
breakfast dwelling
stonham shelter
hotel amarante beau manoir
reasonable quarter span
ski hotels
most talented tourist house booking plat
pick your price hotel
motel hotels
the best airlines
inn booking servicing
ginger hotel
second-rate netbook
seashore tourist house deals
cheap home
g hotel
engage tight-fisted
fraser key accommodation
cap airlines

Anonymous said...

free spin online casino
moes black jack gambling
golden palace casino uninstall
best gambling online roulette style vegas
casino online real gambling
century twenty equal relastate levitown ny
online casino no deposit bonuses
casino gambling
gratuitous palm steersman texas holdem games
on line casinos usa
online casino slots bonus deposit
achieve first place mazuma playing free charge bingo
tax attorney gambling loss
no depsit online casinos sites
online multiplayer gaming
las vegas history gambling
online gambling debates
how fashionable tombola tickets purchased day plan
Gambling forum bonus codes
online casino no deposit bonuses
flash casino no deposit bonus
online gambling bonus
cash loans online casino online
bingo free sign bonus no deposit
online casino slots triopass
bingo online casino poker onlinepoker
poker en ligne
gambling slot machines play
online casino dr lovemore game
schecter diamond series disturbance blackjack
casino slot tournaments online
gambling links
l'auberge casino lake charles la

tasi said...

d9z66j3q80 v1a66d1z96 q6c24n3q82 n0q99m7k77 w1n36a4s46 l2g44n2m25