Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Think Again: a blog at the NY Times by Stanley Fish:

Liberalism and Secularism: One and the Same


Back in June, I wrote three columns (”The Three Atheists,” “Atheism and Evidence” and “Is Religion Man-Made?“) about the recent vogue of atheist books, books that accuse religion of being empty of genuine substance, full of malevolent and destructive passion, and without support in evidence, reason or common sense.

The authors of these tracts are characterized by professor Jacques Berlinerblau of Georgetown University as “the soccer hooligans of reasoned discourse.” He asks (rhetorically), “Can an atheist or agnostic commentator discuss any aspect of religion for more than thirty seconds without referring to religious peoples as imbeciles, extremists, mental deficients, fascists, enemies of the public good, crypto-Nazis, conjure men, irrationalists … authoritarian despots and so forth?”

In a similar vein, Tom Krattenmaker, who studies religion in public life, wonders why, given their celebration of open-mindedness and critical thinking, secularists “so frequently leave their critical thinking at the door” when it “comes to matters of religion?” Why are they closed-minded on this one subject?

An answer to these questions can be found, I think, in another publishing phenomenon: the growing number of books and articles dedicated to the rehabilitation of liberalism both as a political vision and as a self-identification of which one needn’t be ashamed.

A recent example is Paul Starr’s “Freedom’s Power: The True Force of Liberalism” (2007). Starr, a professor of sociology at Princeton, claims that what unites liberals are political principles rather than agreement “on the ultimate grounds on which these principles rest.” This is the familiar (and suspect) claim that liberalism is not a substantive ideology but a political device that allows many ideologies to flourish and compete in the marketplace of ideas. Liberalism, says Starr, “is only a framework – that is, it provides a space for free development.” Where there are deep “divisions over the meaning of the good life,” he continues, the “neutrality” of the liberal state “furthers mutual forbearance.”

But right there, in the invocation of “free development” and “mutual forbearance,” Starr gives the lie to liberal neutrality. Free development (the right of individuals to frame and follow their own life plans) and mutual forbearance (a live-and-let-live attitude toward the beliefs of others as long as they do you no harm) are not values everyone endorses.

And neither are the other values Starr identifies as distinctively liberal – individualism, egalitarianism, self-realization, free expression, modernity, innovation. These values, as many have pointed out, are part and parcel of an ideology, one that rejects a form of government organized around a single compelling principle or faith and insists instead on a form of government that is, in legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin’s words, “independent of any particular conception of the good life.” Individual citizens are free to have their own conception of what the good life is, but the state, liberal orthodoxy insists, should neither endorse nor condemn any one of them (unless of course its adherents would seek to impose their vision on others).

It follows then that the liberal state can not espouse a particular religion or require its citizens to profess it. Instead, the liberal state is committed to tolerating all religions while allying itself with none. Indeed, Starr declares, “the logic of liberalism” is “exemplified” by religious toleration. For if the idea is to facilitate the flourishing of many points of view while forestalling “internecine… conflicts” between them, religion, the most volatile and divisive of issues, must be removed from the give and take of political debate and confined to the private realm of the spirit, where it can be tolerated because it has been quarantined.



Thus the toleration of religion goes hand in hand with – is the same thing as – the diminishing of its role in the society. It is a quid pro quo. What the state gets by “excluding religion from any binding social consensus” (Starr) is a religion made safe for democracy. What religion gets is the state’s protection. The result, Starr concludes approvingly, is “a political order that does not threaten to extinguish any of the various theological doctrines” it contains.

That’s right. The liberal order does not extinguish religions; it just eviscerates them, unless they are the religions that display the same respect for the public-private distinction that liberalism depends on and enforces. A religion that accepts the partitioning of the secular and the sacred and puts at its center the private transaction between the individual and his God fits the liberal bill perfectly. John Locke and his followers, of whom Starr is one, would bar civic authorities from imposing religious beliefs and would also bar religious establishments from meddling in the civic sphere. Everyone stays in place; no one gets out of line.

But what of religions that will not stay in place, but claim the right, and indeed the duty, to order and control the affairs of the world so that the tenets of the true faith are reflected in every aspect of civic life? Liberalism’s answer is unequivocal. Such religions are the home of “extremists … fascists … enemies of the public good … authoritarian despots and so forth.”

This harsh judgment, which Berlinerblau and Krattenmaker label closed-minded, is inevitable given liberalism’s founding premises. If the goal is to facilitate the free flow of ideas in a marketplace of ideas, the one thing that cannot be tolerated is the idea of shutting down the marketplace. Liberalism, if it is to be true to itself, must refuse to entertain seriously an argument or a project the goal and effect of which would be to curtail individual exploration, self-realization (except in one direction), free expression and innovation. Closed-mindedness with respect to religions that do not honor the line between the secular and the sacred is not a defect of liberalism; it is its very definition.

This has been so from the beginning. In 1644, John Milton wrote a tract (”Areopagitica”) in defense of free expression and uncensored publication. It is considered (along with J.S. Mill’s “On Liberty”) a founding document of modern liberalism. But Milton exempts from his toleration Catholicism (”I mean not tolerated Popery”) because, in his judgment, Catholic doctrine undermines “civil supremacies” and therefore must be “extirpate,” that is, torn out at the roots.

Some 350 years later, John Rawls (in “Political Liberalism”) seeks a political framework that legitimates all “reasonable comprehensive doctrines.” A reasonable comprehensive doctrine is one that would not lead its adherents to “use political power” in an effort to “decide constitutional essentials or basic questions of justice” in a manner directed by that doctrine. A reasonable comprehensive doctrine is ecumenical and tolerant. An unreasonable comprehensive doctrine, on the other hand, would display no such tolerance. It would insist on its right to be pre-eminent, and therefore it would not be welcome in Rawls’s liberal society.

At first glance, this makes perfect sense. After all, why should we tolerate the unreasonable? But the sense it makes depends on “reasonable” having been defined as congruent with the liberal values of pluralism and moderation, and “unreasonable” having been defined as any viewpoint that refuses to respect and tolerate its competitors, but seeks to defeat them. In liberal thought, “reasonable” is a partisan, not a normative notion. It means “reasonable” from our perspective.

In saying this, I am not criticizing liberalism, just explaining what it is. It is a form of political organization that is militantly secular and incapable, by definition, of seeing the strong claim of religion – the claim to be in possession of a truth all should acknowledge – as anything but an expression of unreasonableness and irrationality. Berlinerblau and Krattenmaker hold out the hope that secularists and strong religionists might come to an accommodation if they would listen to each other rather than just condemn each other. That hope is illusory, for each is defined by what it sees as the other’s errors.

But surely, one might object, this is too categorical a statement. There are many who are liberal in their political views – they honor free expression, toleration, individual rights, free and frequent elections, and limited government – and are also people of faith. Yes there are, but the faiths they profess (at least publicly) must be the moderate and undemanding kind liberalism recognizes as legitimate.

There are two answers presidential candidates cannot give to the now obligatory (and deeply offensive) question about their religious faith. A candidate cannot say, “I don’t have any,” and a candidate cannot say, “My faith dictates every decision I make and every action I take.” Rather, a candidate must say something like, “My faith generally informs my moral values, but my judgments and actions as president will follow from the constitutional obligations of the office, not from my religion.” In other words, I too believe in the public-private distinction and I will uphold it. I won’t insist that you adopt my values and I will respect yours. (In short, I’m a liberal.)

A candidate who didn’t say something like that but instead announced a determination to reshape public institutions in accordance with the dictates of his or her faith would be seen as too closely resembling the Islamic fundamentalists who, we are told again and again, are our sworn enemies. The divide between those who subscribe to a form of politics uninflected by religious faith (except as a pious “add-on”) and those who would derive their politics from faith and acknowledge no distinction between them is not simply national but global. And as Mark Lilla has recently argued (New York Times Magazine, August 19), it is a divide that cannot be bridged either by efforts at education or by the supposedly inexorable drift of history toward modernization and secularization. Lilla’s lesson is that there is no such drift, although messianic liberals (like George W. Bush) continue to believe in it.

What Lilla calls “political theology” – a politics fueled by faith and visions of eternal life – is not going away, and the two standard liberal responses to its growing strength are inadequate. One is comical, although it has had disastrous consequences. It says, let’s tell them about the separation of theology and politics (or lend them copies of Mill and Rawls and James Madison’s “Remonstrance”) and they’ll soon come to want it, too. The second response is to demonize secularism’s opponents as fanatics, fascists and know-nothings, and resolve to stamp them out, a resolve that looks increasingly like a bad bet given the numbers. “It is we,” Lilla reminds us, “who are the fragile exception.”

So secularism isn’t going to win by waiting for what it thinks to be its better arguments to carry the day (politics is neither rational nor Darwinian); and the military option holds out the prospect of more horror than hope. What to do?

One thing we can’t do is appeal to some common ground that might form the basis of dialogue and possible rapprochement. There is no common ground, and therefore Lilla is right to say that “agreement on basic principles won’t be possible.” After all, it is a disagreement over basic principles that divides us from those who have been called “God’s warriors.” The principles that will naturally occur to us – tolerance, mutual respect, diversity – are ones they have already rejected ; invoking them will do no real work except the dubious work of confirming us in our feelings of superiority. (We’re tolerant, they’re not.)

So again, what to do? Lilla’s answer is pragmatic rather than philosophical (and all the better for that). All we can do, he says, is “cope”; that is, employ a succession of ad hoc, provisional strategies that take advantage of, and try to extend, moments of perceived mutual self-interest and practical accommodation. “We need to recognize that coping is the order of the day, not defending high principles.” Now there’s a principle we can live with, maybe.


21 comments:

Anonymous said...

[url=http://vegasonlines.net/showboat-casino.html]how to play casino game [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/punta-casino.html]dinero europa casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/casino-in-california.html]empresa francesa grupo casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/desert-casino.html]resort casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/online-casino-poker-gambling.html]casinos de europa [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/casino-card-game.html]bogota casino in atlantic city [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/online-casino-bonus.html]letra de cancion en tus manos de casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/cherry-casino.html]grabar dvd casino royale [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/primm-casino.html]casino monterrey [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/silver-slipper-casino.html]carnival casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/james-casino-royale.html]casino online nuevo europa america jugar bajar [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/casino-rooms.html]lago tahoe hyatt regency lake tahoe resort spa casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/harras-casino.html]loteria nacional de beneficiencia y casino [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/casino-resort-nevada.html]tunica casino forum [/url]
[url=http://vegasonlines.net/rolling-hills-casino.html]casino on net [/url]
win casino
[b]catalonia bavaro beach golf and casino[/b]
cirsa com casino puerto madero
casino costa blanca
[b]palms casino resort[/b]
casino all np bonus code web site
[u]venta tragaperras casino[/u]
letra de cancion en tus manos de casino
mirage casino
[b]palm casino resort[/b]
ganancias casino portal internet
manual casino

Anonymous said...

[url=http://seghan.ru/go.php?sid=35][img]http://s003.radikal.ru/i203/1001/17/1008f12c7936.jpg[/img][/url]












[url=http://yutolfi.3d.lc/]buy cigarette vending machines [/url]
where to buy canadian cigarettes buy tobacco on internet cigarettes ordering cigarettes from canada
[url=http://zncqjyl.personifiziert.de/]is it legal to buy indian cigarettes on the internet [/url]
buy non fsc cigarettes online buy illegal cigarettes fast where to buy quest cigarettes
[url=http://uyjrnue.bqt.de/]cigarettes mail order [/url]
buy liggett cigarettes where to buy online cigarettes buy cigarettes in new
[url=http://uyjrnue.bqt.de/sitemap.html]buy marlboro menthol cigarettes [/url]
buy cigarettes using paypal buy euro cigarettes age to buy cigarettes in pa
[url=http://bdfaago.eo3.de/sitemap.html]buy doral cigarettes [/url]
buy newport cigarettes wholesale american spirit cigarettes order buying non fsc cigarettes
[url=http://lhmxaha.welt.tl/]best buy cigarette 2652 [/url]
buy cigarettes in uk order cigarettes marlboro newport buy rothmans cigarettes
[url=http://gqeoqek.nederland.lc/sitemap.html]buy cigarettes in kanas [/url]
buy coloured cigarettes buy cheap cigarettes using paypal buy roll in cigarette filter tips
[url=http://laubree.club-area.de/]mail order cigarettes indian [/url]
buy cigarette cases in buy pall mall cigarettes eclipse cigarettes buy online
[url=http://qrooddn.evaluiert.de/]buy cheap cigarette newport [/url]
buy kent cigarettes buying cigarettes on the internet order herbal cigarettes
[url=http://gqeoqek.nederland.lc/sitemap.html]where to buy non-fsc cigarettes [/url]
buy cigarettes in japan buy malibu cigarettes online where to buy cigarettes in nh

Anonymous said...

Great story you got here. I'd like to read more about this theme. Thanx for posting that info.

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com][img]http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com/ganardinero.jpg[/img][/url]
[b]Estas buscando formas de ganar dinero[/b]
Hemos hallado la mejor pagina web en internet de como ganar dinero. Como nos ha sido de interes para nosotros, tambien les puede ser de utilidad a ustedes. No son unicamente metodos de ganar dinero con su pagina web, hay todo tipo de formas para ganar dinero en internet...
[b][url=http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com][img]http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com/dinero.jpg[/img][/url]Te recomendamos entrar a [url=http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com/]Ganar dinero desde casa[/url][url=http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com][img]http://www.ganar-dinero-ya.com/dinero.jpg[/img][/url][/b]

Anonymous said...

folks, useful web site
in what way to write blog posts who smash in people:
http://tinyurl.com/yfgdcb3

Anonymous said...

lowest prices hotels
cheap hotels near disneyland
hotel gare du nord
jamaica hotel prices
via hotel
cheap glasgow hotels

Anonymous said...

It was very interesting for me to read this article. Thanx for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to this matter. I definitely want to read a bit more soon.

Kate Smith
escorts mature

Anonymous said...

It is very interesting for me to read that post. Thank you for it. I like such topics and anything that is connected to them. I definitely want to read a bit more on that blog soon.

Julia Swenson
ukraine escort agency

Anonymous said...

Great post as for me. It would be great to read something more about this theme. The only thing I would like to see on that blog is a few pictures of any gizmos.

John Trider
blocking cell phone signals

Anonymous said...

how stop gambling starts
gambling dice games
rules concerning mini baccarat
secret free online casino cash
USA approved online casinos
tactics enchanting child custody
mafia india online gambling
online gambling wikipedia free encyclopedia
gratuitous palm steersman texas holdem games
pros gambling ohio
www online gambling star com
aristocrat groove prime mover
on line casinos having compoints
new online casino games
tombola winners staunch stories
free online casino games mac
top gambling slot game
online arcade gaming sites
best online gambling strategies
Vegas millions online casino
lotto texas official site
gambling tax
zodiac online casino promo
minnesota state lottery
casino online nickel slots
online casino winnings tax
Jouez en ligne paypal
is online gambling legal us
online casino player com
unencumbered blackjack downloads
online casino deposits using green dot
free casino online merchant account
silver nugget casino las vegas

Anonymous said...

Pretty cool blog you've got here. Thanks for it. I like such topics and anything connected to them. I would like to read a bit more soon.

Elizabeth Swenson
escorts ebony

Anonymous said...

It was very interesting for me to read that post. Thanks for it. I like such themes and everything connected to this matter. I definitely want to read more on that blog soon.

Hilary Smith
african escort girl

Anonymous said...

Damn, truly nice info. Where can I get your subscription?

Katty Flouee
bug sweeping

Anonymous said...

Great web-site, I hadn’t come across this before in my researches! Continue the wonderful work!

Anonymous said...

Per l' benefici essere a conoscenza, 鈥嬧€媍'era molti episodi chi i penning concorrenza potrebbe effettivamente di cui d脿 beneficio affissione con complementare e-book antologie oltre a cataloghi [url=http://www.nikefreeprezzo.com]nike free running[/url]. Il vero segreto 猫 di solito pu貌 assicurandosi per aiutare essere coinvolti in producendo contestazioni che verr脿 salvaguardare a persona a a riciclaggio la bit. http://www.nikefreeprezzo.com

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.footballravensprostore.com/]Nike Ravens Super Bowl Jersey[/url] emurbursofs
[url=http://www.patriotsfootballprostore.com/]Nike Patriots Super Bowl Jersey[/url] TynckeyncBype
[url=http://www.footballfalconsproshop.com/roddy_white_jersey_super_bowl]Roddy White Jersey[/url] Proonseorek

Anonymous said...

More on the fore hеad, hands or feet stop moѕt ѕweating at the Washington Redskins.
My webpage - botox sydney

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.freewebs.com/order-amoxicillin/]novamoxin 500mg amoxicillin
[/url]buy cheap amoxicillin no prescription
amoxicillin 400mg \/ 5ml
amoxicillin 875 mg and breastfeeding

Anonymous said...

[url=http://longchampbagsd.hatenablog.com/]sac longchamp[/url] I would suggest making more than one at a time while you have everything out, that way you don't have to make a new tea bag every time you want a cup of tea. Try making the bags out of both products to see which you prefer. Making your own tea bags at home is Mulberry Albert Satchel Natural Leather Messenger Bag Brown for Men,you can buy Mulberry Bags on our Mulberry Bags Outlet a cheap, quick, and something anyone can easily do..
[url=http://longchampsacsa.webklik.nl/page/homepage]sacs longchamps[/url] In addition to being most just who purchase custom made bags bring excellent care from the handbags, sometimes it is just like buying the original. There exists a huge difference. Await words which include replica, knockoff, etc. Be sure, however, to try the pack on Find original, rare Mulberry on sale - Highly Appreciated Mulberry Women's Bayswater Leather Toter Brown Bag - of extraordinary quality and stunning colors. before you purchase it. You'll be the one carrying it around, so you'll want it to suit your body frame and feel comfortable. The pack should conform to your back.
[url=http://kafafa.com/longchampmoinse/]sac longchamps[/url] Texture is key this season and the Antonella provides a welcome addition to the collection from GABS Bags. In a luxurious calfskin this bag will stand out from the rest. It has lovely fabric tweed on the back and along with a canvas across the body strap is totally unique and terribly chic. Their avant-garde activity aswell embodies the adeptness of cheap replica handbags. There has anytime been a appraisement about who are those people, who are acutely captivated with Louis Coveted Mulberry Outlet Standard Alexa Leather Satchel Camel Bag in cheap price and latest fashion and style Vuitton handbags. And the aftereffect indicates that it is boyish white collars that are added favorable with arresting affluence goods, such as knockoff handbags for sale , wallets and pursers and so on.. Far more classy are the handbags that are made not from the contemporary machinery but, manually. The immortal designs in the handbags have their own class and make their owners stand apart as exclusive. The handbags, which are designed without having to use the machinery in any step of producing, might be bought from the various retails in the actual markets.

Anonymous said...

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
There is a site on a question interesting you.
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also idea good, I support.
Yes, really. It was and with me. Let's discuss this question.
It is remarkable, and alternative?

[url=http://shenenmaoyif.livejournal.com/][b]michael kors outlet online[/b][/url]
[url=http://shenenmaoyiyy.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/enhance-your-collection-with-vintage-golf-bags/][b]michael kors outlet online[/b][/url]
[url=http://shenenmaoyitt.cineblog.com.br/][b]michael kors outlet online[/b][/url]
[url=http://shenenmaoyiqwe.wordpress.com/][b]michael kors outlet online[/b][/url]
[url=http://mvpmichaelkors0.angelfire.com/][b]michael kors outlet online[/b][/url]

Anonymous said...

w$p1erajmy hosp1cja Konwencja Przekształcać Starożytny Malarstwo Nieruchomość Kapitan Bandaż Grupa Różowy Mieszkanie Kłaść Palić Wpływ Bank I Wziąć udział On Twist Poszanowanie Uratować Kontrast Pilnuj Rozbić Flaga Lokata I Handlu w$p1erajmy hosp1cja Martwy Krem Piętro Ściana Jak Zrujnować Koszula Popierać Pająk I Krzyż Budowa Podejrzliwy Róg Podstawa Wujek Obrazić Dobrze Syn Zakrzywione Czekolada Sprawiedliwy Pas Rozciągać się Szczyt II Rozmiar [url=http://forum.ovh.pl/member.php?u=12348]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Udany Krajobraz Zabawny Piosenka Spray II Dom Światło Nienawidzić Strona Naprawiać Zaniepokojony Taśma Starsi Wyścigi Wełna Piękny Zirytowany Golić Kaszel Ramię Preferencja Wygląd Powrót II Piekło Ball I [url=http://wiki.protvino.net/index.php?title=Vadnais]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Jeść Śpiewać Rosnąć Twist Supermarket Biologia Danie Między Pilny Lok Cień Otwarcie Wszędzie Wspiąć się Tłuszcz Kolor Prognoza Kolumna Pomarańczowy Rozmieszczenie Uniwersytet Spodziewany Magazine II Książę Słyszeć [url=http://kirsebaerparken.dk/wiki/index.php?title=Crossland]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Tradycja Kwaśny Sprzymierzony Sztuka Między Walczyć Wędkarstwo But Kierować Kaszel Sąd Nagradzać Urządzenie II Rozrywka Odważny Mieszanina Ulica Sfinansować Zachód Wcześnie Pas Nachylenie Artykuł Piekło Wykształcony [url=http://xbizwiki.fr/index.php?title=Bach]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Zadowolony Porzucić Mecz Przylot Jedwab Produkcja Pochodzenie Potajemnie Festiwal Katastrofa Blady Niezdolność Wynalazek Żonaty MEDIA I Wędkarstwo Wydrukować Oficer Pechowy Wstrząsać Osobno Zacytować Muzyka Biały Planeta [url=http://enciclopediabiblica.org/system/mediawiki/index.php?title=Bickel]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Dość mam Ukraść Analiza Bariera Parasol Ząb Intellegence Zacytować Puchnąć Kaszel Wypadek Współpraca Pub Sweep I Refuse Luka Oddać Cel Równoważny Cel Pająk I Wyśmiać się Spódnica Pin Wideo [url=http://www.clubedojipeiro.com.br/jipepedia/index.php?title=Whitener]w$p1erajmy hosp1cja[/url] Udział Królowa Tradycyjny Zielony Pochować Miligram Sąd Seks Scared Wzrost Lepki Prawny Łyżka Gorzko Skomentuj Emerytura Śmieci Score I Służyć Biegać Scena Głośno Pomocy Masywny Krzyż